Ellee Seymour

MCIPR, PRESS CONSULTANT, JOURNALIST, POLITICAL AND PR BLOGGER.

Boris 1boris 17boris 16boris 12boris 13boris 15boris4boris2boris 6boris 7boris 9boris 11boris 3
July 20th, 2006

It may seem trivial, but ….

What’s the most you’ve ever been charged for A4 photocopying? Does £11.45 seem pretty steep to you?

And I know local councillors are busy bees, often juggling different roles, but how many laptops do they need to exercise their civic duties efficiently? Up to three, it seems in Norfolk, and all at the taxpayers’ expense.

I didn’t realise that elected members who serve on more than one authority often receive complimentary IT equipment from each of them. I guess they can always decline and say they already have one, or two, or more….

And Fenland Council is reviewing its charges for photocopying in the light of a landmark ruling following the disclosure that their basic fee is 1,250pc higher than a neighbouring council.

One local solicitor had queried being charged £62.50 for photocopies of notes and information kept on a public planning file.

And a local agent says he has written to the council’s finance director after being charged £22.90 for just two copies of a planning document. Is this the highest photocopying fee you have heard of?

Do you have any other ludicrous examples of council waste/over charging?

July 20th, 2006

It helps that she’s blonde and pretty

Bloggers worldwide have united behind La Petite Anglaise
It helps that she’s blonde and pretty, female too. But I do wonder if Catherine Sanderson’s unjust demise would have attracted the same worldwide interest had she been male. In fact, I doubt very much that any man would have been sacked for writing a personal blog and I wish her well with her test case for unfair dismissal in the French employment tribunal.

Using the pseudonym La Petite Anglaise, she has attracted an impressive international following for her musings on love, work and single motherhood.

Her blog postings, which are read by up to 3,000 people a day, do not reveal her own name, nor that of her French former boyfriend who is the father of her three-year-old daughter, and have never identified her employers. Yet the bi-lingual secretary was sacked for gross misconduct amid claims that she brought her accountancy company Dixon Wilson into disrepute. And even though Catherine admits to updating her blog during quiet office hours, tell me one person who has never used the web or phone for personal reasons.

Catherine is very much a modern woman with a natural flair for striking a chord about her daily trials and tribulations as a young and attractive single English woman living in the French capital with her daughter known as Tadpole, her Bridget Jones’ style diary has a romantic Parisian backdrop, and we know what a blockbuster that became.

They say every cloud has a silver lining, and Catherine’s sacking has catapulted her on the road to fame and glory as she has had two book offers and hopes to become a full-time writer.

Meanwhile, the collective fury of bloggers has united to offer their unstinting support to their heroine, whose latest posting has attracted 366 worldwide comments. And what a great scoop for Colin Randall who first reported this after corresponding with Catherine via her blog and realising its full potential.

Dixon Wilson could stand to lose more than just a spirited and creative member of staff if the tribunal decide their actions were unfair and unjust.

Whatever the result, Catherine will end up a winner.

Update: What are the French saying about le blog celebre? Read Croydonian to find out.

July 20th, 2006

Home Office can’t keep track of criminals either

It’s not just asylum seekers the Home Office can’t keep track of, it also does not know many criminals have slipped through the net after cuting off their electronic tags.

The Home Office has shame-facedly admitted that figures recording this crucial statistic are not kept, they have never been requested by the firms which operate the scheme, it was not a requirement of their contract. I find this astounding, it is surely essential in monitoring the success of this scheme, which is meant to be a deterrent to prison and protect the public.

The Home Office has admitted that figures it gave to one of East Anglia’s leading papers, the Eastern Daily Press, were inaccurate. This information was requested by the EDP under the Freedom of Information Act. It seems contractors Serco, which has a five year contract to operate the tagging scheme, gave the Home Office a totally wrong answer.

I am concerned about the effectiveness of tagging and wrote about it at the time. I hope this gross mismanagement is making John Reid’s blood boil too. Has he included plans for the monitoring of tagging to be reviewed in his department’s radical shake up?

There is no weblink for the story in today’s EDP, but it says:

“Red-faced Home Office officials last night admitted that figures on how many criminals cut off their electronic tags were not recorded separately by the private enforcement firms which operate the schemes…

“The admission that incorrect information has again been released by the Home Office will heap further embarrassment on beleagured home secretary John Reid - who reacted furiously after he was forced to apologise to MPs for giving them wrong figures on foreign prisoners earlier this year…

“Inaccurate figures had been provided because the Home Office had been given the information in ‘good faith’ by the contractors.”

Serco confusingly says that statistics on the removal of tags are not recorded separately, but they record those which have been tampered with. In the year between April 2005-2006, there were 81 cases of malicious damage to tags in Cambridgeshire, Norfolk and Suffolk - considerably fewer than the 1,510 mentioned two months ago.

How can we have confidence in a system run like this which is meant to protect the public? Why aren’t accurate figures kept on criminals who cut off their tags? Why aren’t tags made that are foolproof and cannot be removed by offenders? How accurate were the figures given to the Scotsman which has reported that more than half of Scotland’s electronically-tagged offenders breached their orders, according to official figures? Can the Home Office tell us how many criminals are roaming the streets today having removed their electronic tag? Do they know where they are?

July 20th, 2006

Who was the mystery Buck House streaker?

This year’s Wimbledon streaker
Who was the mystery man that bared all and did a streak at the Queen’s garden party last Tuesday?

It seems he was the 18-year-old son of one of the guests and was quickly ushed away by the Yeomen.

This was told to my by a friend who went to another garden party at Buck House this week. And she was told by one of the Yeomen, so it came from a very reliable source.

I happen to know that Trudy was among the guests last Tuesday, but she missed it.

Was he the first person to streak at the palace? Did the Queen or any royalty see him? What was his fate? I’m sure the tabloids would pay a pretty penny for his story.

July 20th, 2006

No greater honour

There is no greater honour than having your work appreciated by your peers. So thanks again to Iain for my second plug on his Channel 4 podcast. My post about Prezza was read out in full on air, which was quite a thrill.

And PR lecturer Richard Bailey has been musing about PR women bloggers and included me among those he regards as “thoughtful, incisive, creative, funny and colourful voices”. His site is top notch and I shall enjoy checking out those others he recommended.

It almost makes giving up my morning swim worthwhile….