Comments on: Does anyone think O J Simpson is innocent?

By: silk comforters

silk comforters — Tue, 08 Nov 2011 01:57:40 +0000

Just want to say your article is as amazing. The clarity for your put up is just nice and that i can assume you’re a professional in this subject. Well together with your permission allow me to take hold of your RSS feed to stay updated with coming near near post. Thank you 1,000,000 and please continue the enjoyable work.

By: john doe

john doe — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:52:59 +0000

He didn’t do it.Too many reasons.Goldman was in a fierce struggle with his killer.O.J. would have had multiple wounds on his body and hands.Tell me this.Could a person go to the airport,talk to alot of people and seem calm after he not only killed 2 people but also left plenty of evidence(glove,hat,blood) at the crime scene and also a glove on his property that would surely point to him.He would know he was in big trouble.The evidence seems too convenient.There’s no way a person could remain calm knowing he killed 2 people and left all these clues that would prove his guilt.Think about it.He had to be set up.

By: Gsharon710

Gsharon710 — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 08:21:51 +0000

If they would look more into Kato, I think the world will have their answer. Kato had access to Oj’s belongings, and I believe the mob or someone high up hired Kato to help frame OJ, while the murder of OJ’s ex-wife was sent as a message to Oj for some reason he is aware of. I think if OJ talked, his remaining family will be in danger. Kato knew he would be on the grounds alone, so why did he not call the police about the noise he heard behind his room? Because he most like lied and this was all in the plan to frame OJ. How hard would it be to get DNA of OJ from his home? Why was the glove behind Kato’s room but no leaves disturbed or bloody. If you think old Oj can carve people up like that with the man fighting, come home, park on the street (dumb move for a murderer) jump a fense go take a shower, hide the evidence and leave for the airport without leaving a bloody mess in his home you are crazy. If OJ did not fight Nicole when he saw her having sexual relations in view of a window, I doubt the recital would cause him to murder his children’s mother. The murderers just smell professional. How does a body hit a wall three times as the example Kato gave in court? You would have to be made of rubber to bounce three times. Did they try to recreate those knocks? How gullible to let a squatter who never finished a sentence in his life, turn so many heads to say OJ is guilty, just because that is what makes news, white wife killed by black ex ball player husband. Bull… OJ let the squatter stay on his property to keep the squatter from living in the same house with his children. What a bum. OF course I have little positive things to say about OJ since the trial, but let’s get real, there are killers out there, and what would you do if you had to keep your mouth shut because you have to protect your family and the world hates you? What a mess our world is in to let this murder take so much air, and chat time. People believe what they want to believe, and the cold hard truth will not change anyone’s mind. I had no doubt that OJ would lose the second trial. No doubt what so ever. This is our world, and welcome to it!

By: Peter Bagetakos

Peter Bagetakos — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:57:08 +0000

It was not possible for the LAPD to have planted evidence against Simpson, because too many people would have had to have been involved.
The testimony of limousine driver Allan Park alone convicts Simpson. Park got there at 10:22, and until about 10:55 Simpson did not answer the house intercom. Then Park saw Simpson walk into his house from the outside. All the lights in front of the house were shut. Simpson then claimed that he had been in the shower. In a normal criminal case, this would have convicted Simpson.
Since this egregious lie by Simpson will not convince the conspiracy theorists that Simpson was guilty, now they will have to add Allan Park as another member of the conspiracy against Simpson.

By: unknown

unknown — Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:31:18 +0000

I believe that the verdict was correct and since innocence is assmued until found guilty, OJ was proved innocent.
Search on Mark Fuhrman 5th ammendment.
The fact is that with the jury out of the court room Fuhrman pled the 5th to ”
did you plant or manufacture any evidence in this case?”
This was after he also said he would plead the 5th to any question asked, which serves to obscure.
The jury was never notified of this. The jury did find enough discrepencies in the case to warrant a “not guilty” verdict however.
Read the case instead of the media on this one. Although I am a white woman, I would have had a hard time saying guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. I do not necessarily believe the verdict was based on race, though I do believe that race was a part of the issue for many and for the media.

By: Truth Seeker

Truth Seeker — Sat, 15 Sep 2007 18:57:38 +0000

I suggest that everyone with an opinion read the lengthy transcripts from the trial. No reasonable person could have found him guilty and believed they did their duty. As Henry Lee stated, “There is something wrong”.

As far as this nasty book……..check your facts again………O.J. did not author this book.

You are all giving far too much credit to what is presented in the media. The fact is that they are the most unreliable source for facts.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 15 Sep 2007 18:55:58 +0000

As far as this nasty book……..check your facts again………O.J. did not author this book.

You are all giving far too much credit to what is presented in the media. The fact is that they are the most unreliable source for facts.

By: Bob

Bob — Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:28:46 +0000

What i find amazing is that just about everyone who has a comment on this case, DON’T KNOW THE FACTS!. The people who are involved with or have knowledge of these murders, is the FBI AND FUHRMAN!. The other two people are dead, Kardashion and Wasz. OJ knows too, but DID NOT DO IT!.

If for 1 second you believe that Marcia Clark Proved her case , then all of you are just as guilty of stupidity.

Nicole was murdered to make a statement to OJ.
KEEP QUIET OR YOUR KIDS ARE NEXT!!

By: The Curmudgeon

The Curmudgeon — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:21:18 +0000

Ah, don’t I wish?

By: Ellee

Ellee — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:45:54 +0000

Curmudgeon, Thanks again, you certainly have all the answers.