<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would you report being raped?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/</link>
	<description>PRESS CONSULTANT, JOURNALIST, GHOSTWRITER, POLITICAL AND PR BLOGGER.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:58:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellee Seymour - MCIPR, PRESS CONSULTANT, JOURNALIST, POLITICAL AND PR BLOGGER. &#187; Why are men getting away with rape?</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/comment-page-1/#comment-9608</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellee Seymour - MCIPR, PRESS CONSULTANT, JOURNALIST, POLITICAL AND PR BLOGGER. &#187; Why are men getting away with rape?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/#comment-9608</guid>
		<description>[...] Why are police so dismissive in nearly a third of cases, is it because the victims are wearing short skirts and had been drinking? Or maybe because they knew the victim, which 86% of women do, meaning it is hard to prove - her word against his? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why are police so dismissive in nearly a third of cases, is it because the victims are wearing short skirts and had been drinking? Or maybe because they knew the victim, which 86% of women do, meaning it is hard to prove &#8211; her word against his? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven_L</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/comment-page-1/#comment-4071</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven_L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/#comment-4071</guid>
		<description>If someone is drunk to the point of unconciousness then having sex with them is rape.  The difficulty is proving it.

Say I was on a jury, drunk boy had met drunk girl in a bar.  She had gone back to his place.  She had been kissing him and got into bed with him.

Now she says that the last thing she remembers was being in bed kissing him and when she woke up she had no clothes on and knew he&#039;d has sex with her.

He says they we kissing each other, touching each other and taking each others clothes off.  Then they had sex with each other.  He says she was awake and carried on kissing him thoughout.

I wouldn&#039;t convict, simple as.  There&#039;s never any witnesses to these situations.  If there&#039;s no sign of violence, they&#039;ve agreed to sleep in the same bed and there&#039;s no signs of a struggle how can you possibly convict when a judge would instruct that you have to find him guilty &#039;beyond reasonable doubt&#039;.

This &#039;I was too drunk to say no&#039; thing doesn&#039;t wash with me either.  If that was the case how on Earth did she get to his place / her place anyway?  If you are too drunk to speak you are too drunk to walk.  You can be so drunk you can&#039;t remember walking home and still make it, but not be so drunk you can&#039;t even say &#039;no&#039; and still be able to get home.

I think a lot of these allegations we&#039;re talking about are genuine date-rapes.  I think many of them are more to do with the girl not remembering what she did last night.  A small number of them are probably malicious complaints by girls who regret what they did.

Yes rapists are lying their way out of trouble.  But I don&#039;t see there is a great deal we can do about it.  There&#039;s a lot of so-called company directors out there that should be prosecuted for fraud, because they are basically running deliberate scams.  Same problem, you can&#039;t prove it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone is drunk to the point of unconciousness then having sex with them is rape.  The difficulty is proving it.</p>
<p>Say I was on a jury, drunk boy had met drunk girl in a bar.  She had gone back to his place.  She had been kissing him and got into bed with him.</p>
<p>Now she says that the last thing she remembers was being in bed kissing him and when she woke up she had no clothes on and knew he&#8217;d has sex with her.</p>
<p>He says they we kissing each other, touching each other and taking each others clothes off.  Then they had sex with each other.  He says she was awake and carried on kissing him thoughout.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t convict, simple as.  There&#8217;s never any witnesses to these situations.  If there&#8217;s no sign of violence, they&#8217;ve agreed to sleep in the same bed and there&#8217;s no signs of a struggle how can you possibly convict when a judge would instruct that you have to find him guilty &#8216;beyond reasonable doubt&#8217;.</p>
<p>This &#8216;I was too drunk to say no&#8217; thing doesn&#8217;t wash with me either.  If that was the case how on Earth did she get to his place / her place anyway?  If you are too drunk to speak you are too drunk to walk.  You can be so drunk you can&#8217;t remember walking home and still make it, but not be so drunk you can&#8217;t even say &#8216;no&#8217; and still be able to get home.</p>
<p>I think a lot of these allegations we&#8217;re talking about are genuine date-rapes.  I think many of them are more to do with the girl not remembering what she did last night.  A small number of them are probably malicious complaints by girls who regret what they did.</p>
<p>Yes rapists are lying their way out of trouble.  But I don&#8217;t see there is a great deal we can do about it.  There&#8217;s a lot of so-called company directors out there that should be prosecuted for fraud, because they are basically running deliberate scams.  Same problem, you can&#8217;t prove it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snafu</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/comment-page-1/#comment-3997</link>
		<dc:creator>Snafu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 13:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/#comment-3997</guid>
		<description>Ellee, I&#039;m afraid you miss my point entirely, we do not live in an ideal world, we live in the real world.

I should not have to lock my car up when I leave it somewhere as no one should steal it, but people will try to steal it so I have to lock it. Equally, you recently commented that you don&#039;t keep a block of knives in your kitchen in case you are burgled and the burglar sees them before you do (or something like that, I hope I&#039;m not misquoting you!).

I am categorically not stating that drunk women deserve to be raped. The whole point is that women should avoid situations where they are putting themselves at risk. I try to avoid dark streets or groups of youths at night for the same reason.

The problem jurors seem to be struggling with is whether consent was given or not when both parties were drunk and one party may regret it in the morning. Criminal convictions are based on &quot;beyond all reasonable doubt&quot;, civil prosecutions are based upon &quot;the balance of probabilities&quot;.

Convictions are bound to fail when it is not beyond all reasonable doubt. I personally believe there is a significant difference between women drinking too much, when they should know their alcohol tolerance(!) and being drugged with medications.

Ellee, I abhor the idea that date rape convictions should be too low or too high rather than a freak of the justice system. Would you prefer the rate to be 10%, 30% or perhaps 60%?

Are too many women found guilty of manslaughter rather than murder of their husbands!?!

Ellee, in answer to your question, I agree with the jurors who suggest it depends on the circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ellee, I&#8217;m afraid you miss my point entirely, we do not live in an ideal world, we live in the real world.</p>
<p>I should not have to lock my car up when I leave it somewhere as no one should steal it, but people will try to steal it so I have to lock it. Equally, you recently commented that you don&#8217;t keep a block of knives in your kitchen in case you are burgled and the burglar sees them before you do (or something like that, I hope I&#8217;m not misquoting you!).</p>
<p>I am categorically not stating that drunk women deserve to be raped. The whole point is that women should avoid situations where they are putting themselves at risk. I try to avoid dark streets or groups of youths at night for the same reason.</p>
<p>The problem jurors seem to be struggling with is whether consent was given or not when both parties were drunk and one party may regret it in the morning. Criminal convictions are based on &#8220;beyond all reasonable doubt&#8221;, civil prosecutions are based upon &#8220;the balance of probabilities&#8221;.</p>
<p>Convictions are bound to fail when it is not beyond all reasonable doubt. I personally believe there is a significant difference between women drinking too much, when they should know their alcohol tolerance(!) and being drugged with medications.</p>
<p>Ellee, I abhor the idea that date rape convictions should be too low or too high rather than a freak of the justice system. Would you prefer the rate to be 10%, 30% or perhaps 60%?</p>
<p>Are too many women found guilty of manslaughter rather than murder of their husbands!?!</p>
<p>Ellee, in answer to your question, I agree with the jurors who suggest it depends on the circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Luc Picard</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/comment-page-1/#comment-3996</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Luc Picard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 13:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/#comment-3996</guid>
		<description>If potential rapists think there is a low chance of being reported, it will only increase the chances of them doing it.

Date rape drugs are dangerous; women need to be careful when partying, especially at this time of year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If potential rapists think there is a low chance of being reported, it will only increase the chances of them doing it.</p>
<p>Date rape drugs are dangerous; women need to be careful when partying, especially at this time of year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassilis</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/comment-page-1/#comment-3992</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassilis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 11:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/#comment-3992</guid>
		<description>Snafu may not be particularly delicate but he has a point Elle - as I mentioned above you&#039;re on dangerous territory if you put legal weight on the fact that the victim was too drunk to consent since it provides similar legal cover to the perpetrator as being too drunk to apprehend the legality of his behaviour.

So the answer to your question &quot;should men have sex with woman when they are too drunk to refuse?&quot; is clear in one sense and that&#039;s no, it&#039;s contemptible, unethical, sleazy and, to my mind, beyond forgiveness. It&#039;s a whole different matter though to say it should be illegal...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snafu may not be particularly delicate but he has a point Elle &#8211; as I mentioned above you&#8217;re on dangerous territory if you put legal weight on the fact that the victim was too drunk to consent since it provides similar legal cover to the perpetrator as being too drunk to apprehend the legality of his behaviour.</p>
<p>So the answer to your question &#8220;should men have sex with woman when they are too drunk to refuse?&#8221; is clear in one sense and that&#8217;s no, it&#8217;s contemptible, unethical, sleazy and, to my mind, beyond forgiveness. It&#8217;s a whole different matter though to say it should be illegal&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/comment-page-1/#comment-3991</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 11:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/#comment-3991</guid>
		<description>Hi Ellee. In Australia...our &quot;codified states&quot; question &quot;Did the accused believe the other person was consenting? If so, was that belief reasonable? Now, a reasonableness test has been formulated in some code jurisdictions as a &quot;reasonable person test&quot;. In Daniels v The Queen (1989) 1 WAR 435, the Supreme Court of Western Australia (Criminal Court of Appeal) held that....&quot;whether it was a reasonable mistake depended on whether an &quot;ordinary&quot; and &quot;reasonable&quot; man (or woman) would have made it in the circumstances which the jury found to have existed&quot;. The fault element (intent or recklessness) must relate to the sexual conduct and the lack of consent. Look, basically its up to the judge to step in after summations, and direct the jury (its done here often and is very successful, especially in cases such as you&#039;ve mentioned. The Jury should be directed to concentrate on the state of mind of the victim...immediately before the act of sexual intercourse, having regard to all the relevant circumstances, and in particular, the events that lead up to the act and her reaction to them, showing their impact on her mind. Juries must apply commonsense, and further judicial elaboration on the meaning of consent is needed in these types of matters. I will say though Ellee, in my experience, the attitudes here of jurors differ a lot to your examples. Sadly, rape and sexual matters are the most difficult to prove because there are usually never any witnesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ellee. In Australia&#8230;our &#8220;codified states&#8221; question &#8220;Did the accused believe the other person was consenting? If so, was that belief reasonable? Now, a reasonableness test has been formulated in some code jurisdictions as a &#8220;reasonable person test&#8221;. In Daniels v The Queen (1989) 1 WAR 435, the Supreme Court of Western Australia (Criminal Court of Appeal) held that&#8230;.&#8221;whether it was a reasonable mistake depended on whether an &#8220;ordinary&#8221; and &#8220;reasonable&#8221; man (or woman) would have made it in the circumstances which the jury found to have existed&#8221;. The fault element (intent or recklessness) must relate to the sexual conduct and the lack of consent. Look, basically its up to the judge to step in after summations, and direct the jury (its done here often and is very successful, especially in cases such as you&#8217;ve mentioned. The Jury should be directed to concentrate on the state of mind of the victim&#8230;immediately before the act of sexual intercourse, having regard to all the relevant circumstances, and in particular, the events that lead up to the act and her reaction to them, showing their impact on her mind. Juries must apply commonsense, and further judicial elaboration on the meaning of consent is needed in these types of matters. I will say though Ellee, in my experience, the attitudes here of jurors differ a lot to your examples. Sadly, rape and sexual matters are the most difficult to prove because there are usually never any witnesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellee</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/comment-page-1/#comment-3990</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 11:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/#comment-3990</guid>
		<description>Snafu, Should men have sex with women when they are too drunk to refuse? Does that count as consenual in your eyes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snafu, Should men have sex with women when they are too drunk to refuse? Does that count as consenual in your eyes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snafu</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/comment-page-1/#comment-3987</link>
		<dc:creator>Snafu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/#comment-3987</guid>
		<description>Ellee, what conviction rate would you like to see? How is that justice!?!

It seems to me that the jurors are being the sensible ones. Women do have a responsibility to look after themselves, they cannot abdicate that responsibility because they are drunk.

Should drunk drivers not be prosecuted as they may be too drunk to know it&#039;s illegal to drive whilst drunk!?!

Should there be different categories of rape such as there are with murder? Is there a difference between &quot;date rape&quot; which is perhaps down to interpretation (and why jurors struggle to convict?) and dragging someone into bushes at knife point to be raped?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ellee, what conviction rate would you like to see? How is that justice!?!</p>
<p>It seems to me that the jurors are being the sensible ones. Women do have a responsibility to look after themselves, they cannot abdicate that responsibility because they are drunk.</p>
<p>Should drunk drivers not be prosecuted as they may be too drunk to know it&#8217;s illegal to drive whilst drunk!?!</p>
<p>Should there be different categories of rape such as there are with murder? Is there a difference between &#8220;date rape&#8221; which is perhaps down to interpretation (and why jurors struggle to convict?) and dragging someone into bushes at knife point to be raped?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellee</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/comment-page-1/#comment-3980</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/#comment-3980</guid>
		<description>Geoff, Who do you suggest would carry these forms - the man or woman?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff, Who do you suggest would carry these forms &#8211; the man or woman?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/comment-page-1/#comment-3979</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 09:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2006/12/07/would-you-report-being-raped/#comment-3979</guid>
		<description>Sorry this link works http://www.collegeslackers.com/video/392</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry this link works <a href="http://www.collegeslackers.com/video/392" rel="nofollow">http://www.collegeslackers.com/video/392</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

