<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuclear power stations risk being flooded</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/</link>
	<description>PRESS CONSULTANT, JOURNALIST, GHOSTWRITER, POLITICAL AND PR BLOGGER.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rethinking nuclear power</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/comment-page-1/#comment-304821</link>
		<dc:creator>Rethinking nuclear power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/#comment-304821</guid>
		<description>[...] years ago on this blog, I asked if our government was reviewing the impact of rising sea levels caused by global warming to our nuclear power stations in the UK. This [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] years ago on this blog, I asked if our government was reviewing the impact of rising sea levels caused by global warming to our nuclear power stations in the UK. This [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellee Seymour - MCIPR, PRESS CONSULTANT, JOURNALIST, POLITICAL AND PR BLOGGER. &#187; Southwold protesters welcome Brown</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/comment-page-1/#comment-117528</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellee Seymour - MCIPR, PRESS CONSULTANT, JOURNALIST, POLITICAL AND PR BLOGGER. &#187; Southwold protesters welcome Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/#comment-117528</guid>
		<description>[...] being flooded during tidal surges. I&#8217;m not the only one concerned about this, which I have written about before, so is Low Carbon Kid.   Please share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] being flooded during tidal surges. I&#8217;m not the only one concerned about this, which I have written about before, so is Low Carbon Kid.   Please share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: electro-kevin</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/comment-page-1/#comment-16917</link>
		<dc:creator>electro-kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/#comment-16917</guid>
		<description>I believe the scientists that aren&#039;t backed by the politicians - generally a good rule of thumb,  James.

Back to solar panels.

The necessary remoteness of these things bothers me from a militarist point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the scientists that aren&#8217;t backed by the politicians &#8211; generally a good rule of thumb,  James.</p>
<p>Back to solar panels.</p>
<p>The necessary remoteness of these things bothers me from a militarist point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameshigham</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/comment-page-1/#comment-16856</link>
		<dc:creator>jameshigham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 07:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/#comment-16856</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s so much misinformation at the moment, as I&#039;ve jsut posted about. The question of Britain was always going to be fraught, should sea levels rise. The question is which scientists to believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s so much misinformation at the moment, as I&#8217;ve jsut posted about. The question of Britain was always going to be fraught, should sea levels rise. The question is which scientists to believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newmania</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/comment-page-1/#comment-16831</link>
		<dc:creator>newmania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/#comment-16831</guid>
		<description>With so many liars about all I can say is that its a good job I`m here :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With so many liars about all I can say is that its a good job I`m here <img src='http://elleeseymour.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newmania</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/comment-page-1/#comment-16830</link>
		<dc:creator>newmania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/#comment-16830</guid>
		<description>CU is right there is limited scope for that sort of alternative energy source in this country . the most practical plan would be to dam the Severn but the Bird Lobby and wet land freaks won’t have it .

I rather agree with them. Those wind farms are an aesthetic blight and they spoil the view . Nuclear Power is the obvious option but there is no reason why there shouldn’t be tax breaks for   greener cars , VAT exemption for green products and any number of positive incentives. Every time they get it wrong with local taxes beating inflation every year why should we be punished for our greenless ways . 
The taxation regime in this country is just to high to start putting additional loads on  and after ten years sensitivity to stealth tax is understandably red raw.
There is no trust for virtuous taxation and nor should there be there have been to many lies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CU is right there is limited scope for that sort of alternative energy source in this country . the most practical plan would be to dam the Severn but the Bird Lobby and wet land freaks won’t have it .</p>
<p>I rather agree with them. Those wind farms are an aesthetic blight and they spoil the view . Nuclear Power is the obvious option but there is no reason why there shouldn’t be tax breaks for   greener cars , VAT exemption for green products and any number of positive incentives. Every time they get it wrong with local taxes beating inflation every year why should we be punished for our greenless ways .<br />
The taxation regime in this country is just to high to start putting additional loads on  and after ten years sensitivity to stealth tax is understandably red raw.<br />
There is no trust for virtuous taxation and nor should there be there have been to many lies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newmania</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/comment-page-1/#comment-16829</link>
		<dc:creator>newmania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/#comment-16829</guid>
		<description>There is little point in listening to Greenpeace who are engaged in a middle lass hobby and do little but discredit   the entire Green argument buy their refusal to listen to anyone lese even as time and again their myopic lies are exposed. As I keep saying just because they are liars does not mean that there is nothing to it . Did you notice the possibility that the IPCC report was fixed for the denial side following political pressure. It has been reported in New Scientists which is a pretty respectable and quietist  tome 
The lead article in the  Speccie today deal with exactly  the problem of coastal erosion ,and like most Green alarms it is  wildly exaggerated . On the other hand the Spec  identifies sea levels the most pressing problem ,especially as they may vary anyway and w are in parts vulnerable naturally. You may well know of the position in Norfolk 
Provided a policy to deal with the problem is in place there is absolutely no reason to be concerned , parts of the Netherlands are 15 feet beneath sea level and it is not a problem. At the moment though ,despite all the worrying about nebulous and science-fiction doomsdays our investment in the real problem of coastal erosion is diminished in fact our defences against floods in general are inadequate . This makes it impossible to obtain insurance for many home  owners, and thereby wipes out millions of value.
Two things are constant .Politicians would rather jet off to climate world forums than deal with the problems of the constituents and the Greens cannot touch a grown up issue without turning it into a teenage angst in your pants fantasy of Armageddon.

Another very good spot Elee which chimes nicely with my reading to day . Incidentally I do keep complete records of two or three papers and journals on about twenty subjects if you are ever looking or something. So do many others I know , its all there. Nick Drew can go back years and years  !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is little point in listening to Greenpeace who are engaged in a middle lass hobby and do little but discredit   the entire Green argument buy their refusal to listen to anyone lese even as time and again their myopic lies are exposed. As I keep saying just because they are liars does not mean that there is nothing to it . Did you notice the possibility that the IPCC report was fixed for the denial side following political pressure. It has been reported in New Scientists which is a pretty respectable and quietist  tome<br />
The lead article in the  Speccie today deal with exactly  the problem of coastal erosion ,and like most Green alarms it is  wildly exaggerated . On the other hand the Spec  identifies sea levels the most pressing problem ,especially as they may vary anyway and w are in parts vulnerable naturally. You may well know of the position in Norfolk<br />
Provided a policy to deal with the problem is in place there is absolutely no reason to be concerned , parts of the Netherlands are 15 feet beneath sea level and it is not a problem. At the moment though ,despite all the worrying about nebulous and science-fiction doomsdays our investment in the real problem of coastal erosion is diminished in fact our defences against floods in general are inadequate . This makes it impossible to obtain insurance for many home  owners, and thereby wipes out millions of value.<br />
Two things are constant .Politicians would rather jet off to climate world forums than deal with the problems of the constituents and the Greens cannot touch a grown up issue without turning it into a teenage angst in your pants fantasy of Armageddon.</p>
<p>Another very good spot Elee which chimes nicely with my reading to day . Incidentally I do keep complete records of two or three papers and journals on about twenty subjects if you are ever looking or something. So do many others I know , its all there. Nick Drew can go back years and years  !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cityunslicker</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/comment-page-1/#comment-16828</link>
		<dc:creator>cityunslicker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/#comment-16828</guid>
		<description>Anon - a netowrk fo solar panels and wind turbines...er what about on still nights? What re we going to do then?

of course we need nuclear power and it is not beyond the wit of man to seal them even if they do sink into the sea (as all of Eastern Englnad will do within 1000 years, allegedly).

Also, flood defences though expensive are not diffcult to achieve. I cite the entire netherlands as an example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon &#8211; a netowrk fo solar panels and wind turbines&#8230;er what about on still nights? What re we going to do then?</p>
<p>of course we need nuclear power and it is not beyond the wit of man to seal them even if they do sink into the sea (as all of Eastern Englnad will do within 1000 years, allegedly).</p>
<p>Also, flood defences though expensive are not diffcult to achieve. I cite the entire netherlands as an example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quasar9</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/comment-page-1/#comment-16814</link>
		<dc:creator>Quasar9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/#comment-16814</guid>
		<description>Ooops Just noticed I forgot to sign in on the Gordon Brown and the Environment - so &lt;em&gt;Jean Luc&lt;/em&gt; or anyone who has a come-back to &lt;em&gt;Anonymous&lt;/em&gt; it was I.

You banned in China? - that wouldn&#039;t be because China &lt;em&gt;erroneously&lt;/em&gt; blames Conservative MEPs for quotas on textile imports. China believes in Free Trade. Did I hear they are already manufacturing toys for next xmas, and cheap lighbulbs for sale in Europe.

Elle and I thought Power Stations were built on the coast, so that they could be &#039;sunk&#039; when decommissioned.  Isn&#039;t Dungeness A (kent) already sinking without rising sea levels. lol!

If sea levels rise 1.7 metres I guess we&#039;ll be using punts or jet-skis to get to work, cars could become redundant and CO2 emissions will be reduced. 

Seems there are two choices in life: cut down on cholesterol, or wait till science and your doctor tells you to reduce cholesterol levels.

PS - For the money we pay for Nuclear Power Stations, you&#039;d think there&#039;d be safeguards in case of accident or flood. But hey BNL might be a private enterprise, but it would still require the government to pick up the tab.
I just love that kind of &#039;private&#039; enterprise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops Just noticed I forgot to sign in on the Gordon Brown and the Environment &#8211; so <em>Jean Luc</em> or anyone who has a come-back to <em>Anonymous</em> it was I.</p>
<p>You banned in China? &#8211; that wouldn&#8217;t be because China <em>erroneously</em> blames Conservative MEPs for quotas on textile imports. China believes in Free Trade. Did I hear they are already manufacturing toys for next xmas, and cheap lighbulbs for sale in Europe.</p>
<p>Elle and I thought Power Stations were built on the coast, so that they could be &#8216;sunk&#8217; when decommissioned.  Isn&#8217;t Dungeness A (kent) already sinking without rising sea levels. lol!</p>
<p>If sea levels rise 1.7 metres I guess we&#8217;ll be using punts or jet-skis to get to work, cars could become redundant and CO2 emissions will be reduced. </p>
<p>Seems there are two choices in life: cut down on cholesterol, or wait till science and your doctor tells you to reduce cholesterol levels.</p>
<p>PS &#8211; For the money we pay for Nuclear Power Stations, you&#8217;d think there&#8217;d be safeguards in case of accident or flood. But hey BNL might be a private enterprise, but it would still require the government to pick up the tab.<br />
I just love that kind of &#8216;private&#8217; enterprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: electro-kevin</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/comment-page-1/#comment-16802</link>
		<dc:creator>electro-kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/03/13/nuclear-power-stations-risk-being-flooded/#comment-16802</guid>
		<description>Not &#039;geeky&#039; Joe - but excellent !  Where can I get some ?  My neighbours are into solar panels and I&#039;d just lurrv to prove &#039;em wrong.  They&#039;ll be absolutely freeezing during cloud cover and I&#039;ll be as warm as toast. Hnnn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not &#8216;geeky&#8217; Joe &#8211; but excellent !  Where can I get some ?  My neighbours are into solar panels and I&#8217;d just lurrv to prove &#8216;em wrong.  They&#8217;ll be absolutely freeezing during cloud cover and I&#8217;ll be as warm as toast. Hnnn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

