<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why must Brown wait another 42 days?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/</link>
	<description>PRESS CONSULTANT, JOURNALIST, GHOSTWRITER, POLITICAL AND PR BLOGGER.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:30:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Nazh</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/comment-page-1/#comment-29586</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Nazh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 05:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/#comment-29586</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s simply because TB as a resignee instead of someone who was voted/thrown out gets to pick his day to leave?

The question should be &quot;Why did they pick a successor 42 days early?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s simply because TB as a resignee instead of someone who was voted/thrown out gets to pick his day to leave?</p>
<p>The question should be &#8220;Why did they pick a successor 42 days early?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/comment-page-1/#comment-29521</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 21:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/#comment-29521</guid>
		<description>Perhaps there are skeletons in the cupboard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps there are skeletons in the cupboard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Worstall</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/comment-page-1/#comment-29430</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Worstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 11:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/#comment-29430</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Interregnum...&lt;/strong&gt;

Ellee Seymour asks: After waiting 13 years for his moment of glory, why must Gordon Brown wait another 42 days before he can become Prime Minister? What is the reason for this delay? To give someone a chance to top...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Interregnum&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Ellee Seymour asks: After waiting 13 years for his moment of glory, why must Gordon Brown wait another 42 days before he can become Prime Minister? What is the reason for this delay? To give someone a chance to top&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Havers</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/comment-page-1/#comment-29413</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Havers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 08:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/#comment-29413</guid>
		<description>As I&#039;ve thought about it more it&#039;s actually made me quite angry.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://haveringhavers.blogspot.com/2007/05/tony-blair-is-liar.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I&#8217;ve thought about it more it&#8217;s actually made me quite angry.</p>
<p><a href="http://haveringhavers.blogspot.com/2007/05/tony-blair-is-liar.html" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Havers</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/comment-page-1/#comment-29409</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Havers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 06:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/#comment-29409</guid>
		<description>&quot;Tony Blair last night reshaped the landscape of British politics by announcing that he will fight the coming general election and, if re-elected, serve a full third term as prime minister, but stand down before the likely election of 2009&quot; ist October Michael White in the Guardian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tony Blair last night reshaped the landscape of British politics by announcing that he will fight the coming general election and, if re-elected, serve a full third term as prime minister, but stand down before the likely election of 2009&#8243; ist October Michael White in the Guardian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Havers</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/comment-page-1/#comment-29408</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Havers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 06:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/#comment-29408</guid>
		<description>Given that TB said he would stand a full term prior to the last election, at least that was my understanding, it has always seemed disingenuous to me that somewhere in the middle of it GB is up for &#039;election&#039; as PM. Most of us have nothing to say on this matter. Given that Gorgon is standing on what seem a whole raft of new policies isn&#039;t it right that we should have?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that TB said he would stand a full term prior to the last election, at least that was my understanding, it has always seemed disingenuous to me that somewhere in the middle of it GB is up for &#8216;election&#8217; as PM. Most of us have nothing to say on this matter. Given that Gorgon is standing on what seem a whole raft of new policies isn&#8217;t it right that we should have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quasar9</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/comment-page-1/#comment-29403</link>
		<dc:creator>Quasar9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 06:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/#comment-29403</guid>
		<description>Elle, it may have something to do with TB really being unable to come to &#039;grips&#039; with relinquishing power.
Plus wanting to squeeze the last &#039;penny&#039; or paycheck as PM to cover his summer holidays.

After all the lecture tour doesn&#039;t start till a bit later on in the year</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elle, it may have something to do with TB really being unable to come to &#8216;grips&#8217; with relinquishing power.<br />
Plus wanting to squeeze the last &#8216;penny&#8217; or paycheck as PM to cover his summer holidays.</p>
<p>After all the lecture tour doesn&#8217;t start till a bit later on in the year</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Paine</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/comment-page-1/#comment-29398</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Paine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 05:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/#comment-29398</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not about the country. It&#039;s about Labour. During the interregnum, Blair can soak up more unpopularity while Brown gently distances himself.   Psychologically, they are trying to manipulate us into thinking this Party stitch-up is a genuine new beginning. I don&#039;t think it will work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not about the country. It&#8217;s about Labour. During the interregnum, Blair can soak up more unpopularity while Brown gently distances himself.   Psychologically, they are trying to manipulate us into thinking this Party stitch-up is a genuine new beginning. I don&#8217;t think it will work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welshcakes Limoncello</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/comment-page-1/#comment-29367</link>
		<dc:creator>Welshcakes Limoncello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2007/05/16/why-must-brown-wait-another-42-days/#comment-29367</guid>
		<description>Agree -Now that it&#039;s confirmed, what&#039;s the point of waiting?  It can&#039;t be any good for the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree -Now that it&#8217;s confirmed, what&#8217;s the point of waiting?  It can&#8217;t be any good for the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

