<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time for renewed debate on GM crops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/</link>
	<description>PRESS CONSULTANT, JOURNALIST, GHOSTWRITER, POLITICAL AND PR BLOGGER.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtney Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/comment-page-1/#comment-127029</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/#comment-127029</guid>
		<description>The &#039;debate&#039; has already been won by the science a long time ago. I mean, where exactly is the science that suggests that genetic modification (GM) is a killer of humans?

The truth is, those who oppose GM couldn&#039;t care less about starvation in developing countries. Such scientific developments have always proved controversial to environmentalists. Indeed, it took environmentalists 30 years, yes, 30 years to concede that using DDT against malaria carrying mosquitoes is &#039;safe and effective&#039;. Some people here might urgue &#039;better 30 year wait than be sorry&#039;, but even now there are still some greens who are in denial about the benefits of DDT. 

If the greens really cared so much about human life, why did they let 3000 children per day die in Africa? When those all those lives could have been saved if DDT were allowed to be used.

Anti-GM protesters have long ignored the scientific case for GM processes. As far as green politicians like Micheal Meacher are concerned “GM is not necessary”. It&#039;s true, he might have a point, but by the same token, the electric light, the aeroplane and the internet is not that &quot;necessary&quot; either - but all three developments have made this world a far better place for us humans to live in - and that&#039;s what really counts here.

If anything, we need to swat the arguments of those green pests who prefer to go around liberating mosquitoes, slugs and butterflies - and who put their petty political green interests before the interests of human lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;debate&#8217; has already been won by the science a long time ago. I mean, where exactly is the science that suggests that genetic modification (GM) is a killer of humans?</p>
<p>The truth is, those who oppose GM couldn&#8217;t care less about starvation in developing countries. Such scientific developments have always proved controversial to environmentalists. Indeed, it took environmentalists 30 years, yes, 30 years to concede that using DDT against malaria carrying mosquitoes is &#8216;safe and effective&#8217;. Some people here might urgue &#8216;better 30 year wait than be sorry&#8217;, but even now there are still some greens who are in denial about the benefits of DDT. </p>
<p>If the greens really cared so much about human life, why did they let 3000 children per day die in Africa? When those all those lives could have been saved if DDT were allowed to be used.</p>
<p>Anti-GM protesters have long ignored the scientific case for GM processes. As far as green politicians like Micheal Meacher are concerned “GM is not necessary”. It&#8217;s true, he might have a point, but by the same token, the electric light, the aeroplane and the internet is not that &#8220;necessary&#8221; either &#8211; but all three developments have made this world a far better place for us humans to live in &#8211; and that&#8217;s what really counts here.</p>
<p>If anything, we need to swat the arguments of those green pests who prefer to go around liberating mosquitoes, slugs and butterflies &#8211; and who put their petty political green interests before the interests of human lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: electro-kevin</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/comment-page-1/#comment-126484</link>
		<dc:creator>electro-kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 12:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/#comment-126484</guid>
		<description>I agree wholeheartedly with the persuit of GM crop development as I do the Hadron Colider experiments.  There are two reasons:

- the genie is already out of the bottle

- our raison detre&#039; as a species is to advance and not remain static

I would never argue against anyone&#039;s right to enjoy the same rights to bountiful supplies of food that I have enjoyed but here comes the negative (well you know me by now !):

We cannot be conservationists by usurping nature&#039;s methods of population control.  In persuance of this technology we must give up all pretence at trying to prevent global warming.  The further explosions in population that this is bound to cause runs counter to the global warmist&#039;s arguments as adopted by EU and domestic politicians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree wholeheartedly with the persuit of GM crop development as I do the Hadron Colider experiments.  There are two reasons:</p>
<p>- the genie is already out of the bottle</p>
<p>- our raison detre&#8217; as a species is to advance and not remain static</p>
<p>I would never argue against anyone&#8217;s right to enjoy the same rights to bountiful supplies of food that I have enjoyed but here comes the negative (well you know me by now !):</p>
<p>We cannot be conservationists by usurping nature&#8217;s methods of population control.  In persuance of this technology we must give up all pretence at trying to prevent global warming.  The further explosions in population that this is bound to cause runs counter to the global warmist&#8217;s arguments as adopted by EU and domestic politicians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CherryPie</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/comment-page-1/#comment-126479</link>
		<dc:creator>CherryPie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/#comment-126479</guid>
		<description>I think thorough research needs to be done before deciding one way or the other.  This should then be followed by a reasoned debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think thorough research needs to be done before deciding one way or the other.  This should then be followed by a reasoned debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellee</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/comment-page-1/#comment-126386</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/#comment-126386</guid>
		<description>I have just spoken to Robert&#039;s researcher in Brussels who told me the Financial Times are following up on our press release and interviewing Robert on this story. The Sunday Times are also speaking to him about his great work on pesticides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just spoken to Robert&#8217;s researcher in Brussels who told me the Financial Times are following up on our press release and interviewing Robert on this story. The Sunday Times are also speaking to him about his great work on pesticides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letters From A Tory</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/comment-page-1/#comment-126375</link>
		<dc:creator>Letters From A Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/#comment-126375</guid>
		<description>What a surprise - basing a campaign on fear instead of relying solely on the facts.

Reminds me a bit of the climate change lobby.

http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a surprise &#8211; basing a campaign on fear instead of relying solely on the facts.</p>
<p>Reminds me a bit of the climate change lobby.</p>
<p><a href="http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welshcakes Limoncello</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/comment-page-1/#comment-126332</link>
		<dc:creator>Welshcakes Limoncello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/#comment-126332</guid>
		<description>Excellent post, Ellee.  I would welcome an informed and non-emotional debate because I really do not understand all the issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, Ellee.  I would welcome an informed and non-emotional debate because I really do not understand all the issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameshigham</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/comment-page-1/#comment-126291</link>
		<dc:creator>jameshigham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/#comment-126291</guid>
		<description>Whilst accepting the argument, it still doesn&#039;t establish the innocence of GM foods - one study, Ellee.  A collection of studies maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst accepting the argument, it still doesn&#8217;t establish the innocence of GM foods &#8211; one study, Ellee.  A collection of studies maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quasar9</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/comment-page-1/#comment-126265</link>
		<dc:creator>Quasar9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/#comment-126265</guid>
		<description>I guess we need
&quot;Art for Art&#039;s sake, and Science for Science sake&quot;
But honestly right now, I guess there would be many allotment holders who wish they had a breed of rot or blight resistant tomatoes ...
Last month&#039;s lack of of Sun and over plentiful rain, mean that the crops haven&#039;t quite ripened

and suddenly over the last few days turned black. - What a pity, what a waste.
Fortunately it does not happen to large or industrial growers, and the fact that they are grown in greenhouses by large or industrial growers does mean they are less vulnerable to &#039;natural&#039; weather conditions, and less vulnerable to &#039;natural&#039; predators or insects.

And you get &#039;nice&#039; looking fresh tomatoes in the supermarket, and plentiful tinned toms.

I say thank God, for industrial plastic tunnels and industrial greenhouses.
I say thank God, for the multi-variety of tomatoes, and &#039;natural&#039; selection by Man.

PS - I&#039;m a little tired of cherry or vine tomatoes. So cutesy, yet so small and full of seeds. I say bring back plum tomatoes and especially beef tomatoes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we need<br />
&#8220;Art for Art&#8217;s sake, and Science for Science sake&#8221;<br />
But honestly right now, I guess there would be many allotment holders who wish they had a breed of rot or blight resistant tomatoes &#8230;<br />
Last month&#8217;s lack of of Sun and over plentiful rain, mean that the crops haven&#8217;t quite ripened</p>
<p>and suddenly over the last few days turned black. &#8211; What a pity, what a waste.<br />
Fortunately it does not happen to large or industrial growers, and the fact that they are grown in greenhouses by large or industrial growers does mean they are less vulnerable to &#8216;natural&#8217; weather conditions, and less vulnerable to &#8216;natural&#8217; predators or insects.</p>
<p>And you get &#8216;nice&#8217; looking fresh tomatoes in the supermarket, and plentiful tinned toms.</p>
<p>I say thank God, for industrial plastic tunnels and industrial greenhouses.<br />
I say thank God, for the multi-variety of tomatoes, and &#8216;natural&#8217; selection by Man.</p>
<p>PS &#8211; I&#8217;m a little tired of cherry or vine tomatoes. So cutesy, yet so small and full of seeds. I say bring back plum tomatoes and especially beef tomatoes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/comment-page-1/#comment-126252</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/#comment-126252</guid>
		<description>Quote:“We should consider all options and encourage more research and development, particularly as we are experiencing a global food crisis, concerns about providing our future energy requirements and reduced land availability. Our views should be based on scientific evidence, and not emotive scaremongering.&quot;

Absolutely! GM has simply saved millions if not billions of lifes and it&#039;s safety has been proven time and time again. The issue, I believe, is not with the amount of food produced but the access and food sercurity. Science can make the food; it&#039;s up to humans to sercure for those who need it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote:“We should consider all options and encourage more research and development, particularly as we are experiencing a global food crisis, concerns about providing our future energy requirements and reduced land availability. Our views should be based on scientific evidence, and not emotive scaremongering.&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely! GM has simply saved millions if not billions of lifes and it&#8217;s safety has been proven time and time again. The issue, I believe, is not with the amount of food produced but the access and food sercurity. Science can make the food; it&#8217;s up to humans to sercure for those who need it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philipa</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/comment-page-1/#comment-126247</link>
		<dc:creator>Philipa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2008/09/10/time-for-renewed-debate-on-gm-crops/#comment-126247</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;We should consider all options and encourage more research and development, particularly as we are experiencing a global food crisis&lt;/i&gt;

Why should we? Are we experiencing a global food crisis or unsustainable population growth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>We should consider all options and encourage more research and development, particularly as we are experiencing a global food crisis</i></p>
<p>Why should we? Are we experiencing a global food crisis or unsustainable population growth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

