<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overtaking Labour&#8217;s vote share lead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elleeseymour.com/2009/11/17/overtaking-labours-vote-share-lead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2009/11/17/overtaking-labours-vote-share-lead/</link>
	<description>PRESS CONSULTANT, JOURNALIST, GHOSTWRITER, POLITICAL AND PR BLOGGER.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:22:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Reckons</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2009/11/17/overtaking-labours-vote-share-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-177329</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Reckons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2009/11/17/overtaking-labours-vote-share-lead/#comment-177329</guid>
		<description>The rotten electoral system does favour Labour more than the Conservatives. The figures you quote I think are related to England only - in the UK overall Labour got about 35% of the vote and 55% of the seats. But the system massively favours both major parties over all the smaller parties. In a good year something like 42% or 43% would likely give you more than 50% of the seats so it&#039;s a bit rich to complain about the electoral system unless you are willing to embrace proper proportional change.

Regarding the end of your post, I think you might be right. It may well be the case that the Conservatives only get a very small majority in May/June next year but what makes you think that in another election a year hence it would establish a strong and convincing lead? If anything, given the economic difficulties Cameron would face under those circumstances I would suggest if anything it would be likely to result in fewer seats for the Conservatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rotten electoral system does favour Labour more than the Conservatives. The figures you quote I think are related to England only &#8211; in the UK overall Labour got about 35% of the vote and 55% of the seats. But the system massively favours both major parties over all the smaller parties. In a good year something like 42% or 43% would likely give you more than 50% of the seats so it&#8217;s a bit rich to complain about the electoral system unless you are willing to embrace proper proportional change.</p>
<p>Regarding the end of your post, I think you might be right. It may well be the case that the Conservatives only get a very small majority in May/June next year but what makes you think that in another election a year hence it would establish a strong and convincing lead? If anything, given the economic difficulties Cameron would face under those circumstances I would suggest if anything it would be likely to result in fewer seats for the Conservatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

