<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blair and Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/</link>
	<description>PRESS CONSULTANT, JOURNALIST, GHOSTWRITER, POLITICAL AND PR BLOGGER.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:36:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best Casino Bonus Online</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-178980</link>
		<dc:creator>Best Casino Bonus Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/#comment-178980</guid>
		<description>I actually think his lack of apology is consistent with his statements in the enquiry. If he believed Iraq needed &quot;sorting out&quot; then who apologises for doing the right thing?

To do that would be a tacit admission that invading Iraq was wrong. In his mind, or for the purposes of the enquiry at the very least, the invasion was the right decision. On that basis, an apology would have looked inconsistent and tokenistic - and been criticised also.

Any apology invites the question - so why did you do it in the first place then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually think his lack of apology is consistent with his statements in the enquiry. If he believed Iraq needed &#8220;sorting out&#8221; then who apologises for doing the right thing?</p>
<p>To do that would be a tacit admission that invading Iraq was wrong. In his mind, or for the purposes of the enquiry at the very least, the invasion was the right decision. On that basis, an apology would have looked inconsistent and tokenistic &#8211; and been criticised also.</p>
<p>Any apology invites the question &#8211; so why did you do it in the first place then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard @ French Property</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-178906</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard @ French Property</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/#comment-178906</guid>
		<description>Been a bad week for Bliar (lovely posters); first the appearance at the Enquiry, and then his &quot;ego&quot; exposed in the excellent Mo Mowlam Channel 4 Drama.

Why could he not bring himself to close with a reference (even if he could not apologise) to the suffering of the families in the UK and Iraq as a result of the war?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been a bad week for Bliar (lovely posters); first the appearance at the Enquiry, and then his &#8220;ego&#8221; exposed in the excellent Mo Mowlam Channel 4 Drama.</p>
<p>Why could he not bring himself to close with a reference (even if he could not apologise) to the suffering of the families in the UK and Iraq as a result of the war?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welshcakes Limoncello</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-178860</link>
		<dc:creator>Welshcakes Limoncello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/#comment-178860</guid>
		<description>I would agree with that. Poor Dr Kelly was an honourable man who was scapegoated, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with that. Poor Dr Kelly was an honourable man who was scapegoated, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellee</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-178849</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/#comment-178849</guid>
		<description>Dudy, please feel free to post any views you have in the comment facility here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dudy, please feel free to post any views you have in the comment facility here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dudy Adityawan</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-178844</link>
		<dc:creator>Dudy Adityawan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/#comment-178844</guid>
		<description>I am not sure if I agree with your post here. See you do make the best point, I don’t think you have actually given a large amount of thought to the opposite side of the argument. Perhaps I could do a guest post or a follow-up, just tell me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure if I agree with your post here. See you do make the best point, I don’t think you have actually given a large amount of thought to the opposite side of the argument. Perhaps I could do a guest post or a follow-up, just tell me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philipa</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-178840</link>
		<dc:creator>Philipa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/#comment-178840</guid>
		<description>Wow! Thanks for that link, Ellee. Good on her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Thanks for that link, Ellee. Good on her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellee</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-178835</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/#comment-178835</guid>
		<description>Pip, I wonder what would have happened if the protester did manage to perform a citizen&#039;s arrest on Blair. I admired her guts:

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Iraq-Inquiry-Protester-Restrained-Trying-To-Perform-Citizens-Arrest-On-Tony-Blair/Article/201001415537885?lpos=Politics_First_Home_Article_Teaser_Region_4&amp;lid=ARTICLE_15537885_Iraq_Inquiry%3A_Protester_Restrained_Trying_To_Perform_Citizens_Arrest_On_Tony_Blair_</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pip, I wonder what would have happened if the protester did manage to perform a citizen&#8217;s arrest on Blair. I admired her guts:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Iraq-Inquiry-Protester-Restrained-Trying-To-Perform-Citizens-Arrest-On-Tony-Blair/Article/201001415537885?lpos=Politics_First_Home_Article_Teaser_Region_4&#038;lid=ARTICLE_15537885_Iraq_Inquiry%3A_Protester_Restrained_Trying_To_Perform_Citizens_Arrest_On_Tony_Blair_" rel="nofollow">http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Iraq-Inquiry-Protester-Restrained-Trying-To-Perform-Citizens-Arrest-On-Tony-Blair/Article/201001415537885?lpos=Politics_First_Home_Article_Teaser_Region_4&#038;lid=ARTICLE_15537885_Iraq_Inquiry%3A_Protester_Restrained_Trying_To_Perform_Citizens_Arrest_On_Tony_Blair_</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philipa</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-178834</link>
		<dc:creator>Philipa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/#comment-178834</guid>
		<description>Cripes I didn&#039;t write that well - I didn&#039;t expect an apology or regrets, as you say, Ellee. But I expected TB to be impeached or something, anything, but he got away with it. They all did. David Kelly is still very dead. So sad. So many have died.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cripes I didn&#8217;t write that well &#8211; I didn&#8217;t expect an apology or regrets, as you say, Ellee. But I expected TB to be impeached or something, anything, but he got away with it. They all did. David Kelly is still very dead. So sad. So many have died.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philipa</title>
		<link>http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-178831</link>
		<dc:creator>Philipa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elleeseymour.com/2010/01/30/blair-and-iraq/#comment-178831</guid>
		<description>Oh I did. The man would say anything to save his skin. Did you notice the proliferation of &#039;Can I just say..&#039; ? Allowing him to answer the question he preferred rather than the one that was asked.  They don&#039;t call him &#039;Teflon Tony&#039; for nothing. 

I think the Chilcott enquiry has exposed it&#039;s inability to adequately question TB. 

I agree with you, Ellee but perhaps Labour won because the opposition was so weak? I don&#039;t understand why TB was not impeached.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I did. The man would say anything to save his skin. Did you notice the proliferation of &#8216;Can I just say..&#8217; ? Allowing him to answer the question he preferred rather than the one that was asked.  They don&#8217;t call him &#8216;Teflon Tony&#8217; for nothing. </p>
<p>I think the Chilcott enquiry has exposed it&#8217;s inability to adequately question TB. </p>
<p>I agree with you, Ellee but perhaps Labour won because the opposition was so weak? I don&#8217;t understand why TB was not impeached.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

