A warm hearted family who wanted to become foster parents have been rejected for using the “inappropriate” words “white foreigner”.

Dave Mott and his wife Sue Sarah, who have three children, including a disabled son, are naturally stunned and disappointed. Although they could appeal, they feel it would be pointless as their local social services have no confidence in them.

Dave and Sue Sarah had been attending a four day fostering workshop in Peterborough and were late one day due to a road accident. They told their tutor that the accident involved “white foreigners”, Dave could see they were of Eastern European origin.

No reference was made about this was made during the workshop, his comment were never discussed further, so he naturally thought no more about it. He was later told it was felt that he could use other similar “inappropriate” comments which an ethnic child might find upsetting.

Peterborough is extremely multi-national and Dave has a good Asian friend known as Mick the Hat because of the turban he wears. Mick doesn’t mind this name and has a good laugh about it. Dave could have provided dozens of references, including some from ethnic backgrounds. He is plainly not racist.

I would have thought the most important requirements for fostering were providing a loving and stable home to a young person who comes from a very unsettled background. Dave and his wife would have welcomed them with open arms, their secure base would also have helped plug the gap in the shortage of foster families.

Being politically correct – and insanely so in this case – has lost countless children the chance to enjoy and benefit from being part of the Mott household, who are entitled to feel offended too. Has any consideration been given to their feelings about this?

I naturally feel it was Peterborough Social Services whose actions were inappropriate here, what do you think?