Ellee Seymour

MCIPR, PRESS CONSULTANT, JOURNALIST, POLITICAL AND PR BLOGGER.

December 8th, 2006

Prostitutes plead for police amnesty after second death

The body of second missing Ipswich prostitute Tania Nicol (left) is believed to have been discovered by police in a pond today. The naked body of her friend Gemma Adams (right) was found last Saturday in a stream

The English Collective of Prostitutes believe other prostitutes have also gone missing from the area over recent years. They fear there will be a repeat of the Yorkshire Ripper horror unless they and their clients are immediately granted an amnesty from arrest.

This is a statement they have just issued and sent to me:

When prostitute women are not safe, no woman is safe

Gemma Adams and a woman the police believe to be Tania Nicol, have now both been found tragically murdered in Ipswich. We pass our deepest condolences to their loved ones. A number of women also working as sex workers have gone missing in the area in recent years. In order to save lives and not to repeat the horror of the Yorkshire Ripper, who was allowed to continue killing until 13 women had been murdered, the Suffolk police must not use the criminality imposed on sex workers by the prostitution laws as an excuse to deny women the protection we are all entitled to by law.

We demand:

  • an immediate temporary amnesty from arrest for prostitute women and clients so that anyone can come forward to give information to this inquiry without fear of criminalisation or harassment; (Previously, women with outstanding arrest warrants either couldn’t contact the police or when they did were arrested. (See Criminalisation: the price women and children pay, English Collective of Prostitutes response to the government’s review of the prostitution laws, December 2004)

  • an end to street sweeps, arrests and ASBOs against prostitute women and clients which have forced women into darker, more isolated areas making them more vulnerable to rape, violence and even murder. Women working under increased pressure are less able to look out for each other, have less time to check out clients and are forced to take more risks;

  • a change in police priorities; money and resources being used to prosecute women and clients for consenting sex must be re-directed into vigorously pursuing violent men and protection of all women

  • following the example of New Zealand, decriminalisation of the prostitution laws, which by criminalising sex workers signal that women’s lives are not worth much. The police and courts don’t protect women and violent men think they can get away with attacks.

The police are telling women to look out for each other and come forward with information. But whatever safety systems that women have and will work out among themselves, they can never substitute for the police doing the job that the public overwhelmingly wants them to do – protect sex workers from rape and other attacks.

Over 70% of prostitute women are mothers. As poverty, homelessness and debt go up and women’s wages go down, more women (especially with Xmas round the corner) are forced into prostitution to support themselves and their families. Every woman is some mother’s daughter, someone’s sister, aunt, beloved friend . . . Every life is of value.

I would like to know how many other women have gone missing too, is it feared they are also dead? Why haven’t we heard about this before?

I don’t see how police can deny this request from the ECP, otherwise they face alienating themselves at a time when they particularly need the trust of those whose lives were closely entwined with the two murdered young women, they will only force them underground. Suffolk police have already upset the local press, I’m wondering if the reporter’s investigation was based around this case.

As the statement says, every woman is someone’s mother, daughter, sister, aunt, beloved and friend. I hope that police and government will one day soon work with these women to legalise brothels rather than waste time and money on prosecuting adults for consensual sex.

Update: 9 December 2006, today’s Times, and the East Anglian, double murder hunt launched.

Update: 10 December 2006, today’s Sunday Times, fear that “East Anglia Ripper” has killed six.

Update: 10 December, BBC Online runs the same story.

December 8th, 2006

Will Sheikh Mohammed be a great ruler of Liverpool FC?

Reports that Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum wants to buy Liverpool FC came as no big surprise to me. I follow the news about his Godolphin horse racing empire in Newmarket and am a keen follower of this sport.

I can quite understand why the Crown Prince of Dubai wants to challenge Roman Abramovich, a little bird told me during a recent visit to Newmarket’s horse sales that the Russian billionaire had two buyers there on the lookout for top racehorses for Abramovich. I cannot imagine the Sheikh was too pleased about that.

While a Liverpool fan believes there are advantages to having a new royal boss, it seems that UEFA is concerned that the rise of powerful, money-rich owners could “destroy the game”.

Their spokesman said:

“The immediate threat in the short term is a huge increase in the gap between the haves and the havenots, and in the long-term, it may lead to inflation in wages and transfer fees and a concentration of power that could destroy the game.”

An FA spokesman described it as an “emotive issue”, that they were bound by laws on what they could do.

“There are laws which govern businesses and takeovers and we have a fit and proper persons test.But it would be inappropriate to discriminate on the grounds of nationality.”

Surely only billionaires can afford to spend £450 million on buying a football club, as well as the extra millions needed to invest in players. When was the last time that happened in the UK? This means we need to accept the globalization of ownership.

The Sheikh’ friends speak of a man who is fiercely competitive and highly ambitious. Reports suggest he is the world’s fifth richest man, but he does not enjoy finishing fifth.

The Sheikh is also a spiritual man, this quote from his website could be pinned up in the players’ changing room to help inspire them:

“The word ‘impossible’ is not in leaders’ dictionaries. No matter how big the challenges, strong faith, determination and resolve will overcome them.”

Besides the investment, I think the Sheikh would make an excellent ruler of Liverpool FC, he would bring a new dimension to the sport and be driven by his constant desire to be No 1 in the world.

Do you agree with UEFA that too many money rich owners could destroy the game? Can Liverpool FC afford to miss out on this golden opportunity?

Pic courtesy of The First Post.

Update: Thanks to Guardian Unlimited for giving this post a plug listed under “best of the web”.

|