Ellee Seymour

MCIPR, PRESS CONSULTANT, JOURNALIST, POLITICAL AND PR BLOGGER.

January 9th, 2008

Defra’s £100,000 staff trebles – and a £63 million fine

Here’s one for Burning Our Money. The number of Defra staff earning more than £100,000 has trebled in the past five years.image

This cannot surely be linked to their performance as it struggles with waste and recycling, climate change, floods, coastal erosion, supporting our farmers – and ensuring they get their payments on time. We now learn that delays in payments have led to the taxpayer picking up the bill for spectacular fines totalling £63 million. The government has put by £292 million to cover the final cost of EU fines.

A press release just issued by the Conservative Press Office in Brussels describes how the cost of Margaret Beckett’s calamitous failure as Environment Secretary to get the 2005 Single Farm Payments out in time became clearer last night after it emerged British taxpayers had already paid £63 million in EU fines for failing to meet the statutory deadline.

The figure was published last night in a Commons written reply from Environment Minister Jonathan Shaw. The National Audit Office said last month that Defra has set aside a total of £292 million to cover possible fines, which are customarily announced by the Commission in the spring.

The Minister also revealed that the number of staff earning £100,000 or more at Defra had more than trebled in the past five years. In 2002, eight people were on such salaries, but that figure was 25 last year.

MEP Neil Parish, Conservative Agricultural spokesman for the EP, said:

“The fact our government has already paid out this much before the full extent of the fines has been announced suggests Defra is expecting an expensive rebuke from the European Commission.

British farmers are still recovering from calamitous failures at Defra that led to so many farmers receiving their payments excessively late. Margaret Beckett introduced a complex system for making payments against all the advice being offered. While there has been widespread incompetence, the main reasons for the delay were poor Ministerial decisions.

“Unfortunately, while the EU is justified to impose these fines, current evidence suggests the Treasury will pay for them by cutting Defra’s budget.

“If Defra is to make cutbacks, perhaps it should begin by halting the huge number of officials on vast salaries. British farmers will be incensed to hear the department’s bureaucracy has bulged at a time when its frontline services are to be substantially cut.

“British farmers continue to suffer as a result of Labour.”

If these huge fines are to be offset against Defra at a time when it faces so many crucial challenges, how on earth is it going to improve on its delivery? Matters can only get worse, and this is very worrying as I believe our agricultural landscape particularly needs much more support, that food security and drought stress are very real problems we will be facing in the near future.

January 9th, 2008

How could pollsters get it so wrong?Does it come down to race?

image

image

Crikey, what an amazing result following pollsters’ predictions of another sweeping victory for Democrat Barack Obama in New Hampshire.

He seemed a dead cert to win ahead of rival Hillary Clinton, but virtually all of the late polling on the Democratic side proved to be very wrong. The last Rasmussen Report had Obama +7 over Clinton. CBS had him +7. USA Today had Obama +13 and CNN +10.

So how could pollsters have got it so wrong? Huffington Post writer David Kuo believes that it comes down to race, that despite all the talk of how little race matters in this campaign, it is clear that race is still a big deal in bi-racial campaigns. He believes it is a return to the race-gap polling problems of the 1980s and 1990s:

This phenomenon was first noticed in the 1982 race for governor of California, where Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley, a black Democrat, narrowly lost to Republican George Deukmejian, despite polls showing him with a lead ranging from 9 to 22 points. The next year, African-American Democrat Harold Washington barely won his race for mayor of Chicago against Republican Bernard Epton. Pre-election polls taken within the last two weeks of the campaign showed Washington with a 14-point lead.

I personally think Bill Clinton is too much baggage for Hillary to carry, that a desire for change will win over Hillary’s experience.

Update: Great quote from Dave Barry: “The Democrats seem to be basically nicer people, but they have demonstrated time and again that they have the management skills of celery. They’re the kind of people who’d stop to help you change a flat, but would somehow manage to set your car on fire. I would be reluctant to entrust them with a Cuisinart, let alone the economy. The Republicans, on the other hand, would know how to fix your tire, but they wouldn’t bother to stop because they’d want to be on time for Ugly Pants Night at the country club.”

|