Ellee Seymour

MCIPR, PRESS CONSULTANT, JOURNALIST, POLITICAL AND PR BLOGGER.

Boris 1boris 17boris 16boris 12boris 13boris 15boris4boris2boris 6boris 7boris 9boris 11boris 3
January 25th, 2008

Are men discriminated against?

Home Office Minister Vernon Coaker made two references at image yesterday’s sex trafficking conference expressing surprise at the zero media coverage following the launch of a new organisation called the Men’s Coalition.

It aims to advise government and other policy makers on designing policies and services that take account of the specific needs and experiences of men in a wide range of areas, including violence, crime, parenting, relationships, health, work and education.

It also seeks to identify “how masculinities and men’s experiences” should inform and enable government and other agencies to develop a collaborative approach to gender equality.

Having read this far, you are probably wondering, like me, what exactly this means, and whether men really feel discriminated against?

Members of the Coalition include the Men’s Health Forum, Respect, Fatherhood Institute, Men’s Advice Line, Relate, the Research Unit on Men and Masculinities at Bradford University, NCH and the White Ribbon Campaign. It is also supported by the Home Office and the Government Equalities Office.

The Coalition’s core principles outline how “the specific needs and experiences of men and boys are not well understood or taken into account in the development of public policy or professional practice across a wide range of areas”.

It believes that “men and boys should not be discriminated against, stereotyped or overlooked in the development of policy and practice, that men and boys, and women and girls, should be explicitly included in the development of policy and practice.”

Excuse me, but I thought opportunity was already available in our democratic system, this is what I do not understand. And are men being discriminated against in policy making decisions?

And what do these two statements mean about their intentions:

“To promote the understanding of how the social construction of masculinities functions within a range of diverse social and cultural contexts.

“To promote effective mechanisms for government and other agencies to engage with men and boys and develop gender-sensitive policies.

I have no idea how much money, if any, the government has spent on supporting this Coalition. The reason for the lack of media interest could be because the Coalition serves no real purpose, that facilities and processes already exist to achieve its aims.

Government should be inspiring and helping our men at an earlier stage in their lives so they leave school with skills that carry them through life, they should focus on helping them to achieve better results at school and raise awareness about specific male health concerns that could be cutting their life short.

Come on guys, there isn’t a Women’s Coalition along the same lines as far as I know, and women are certainly discriminated against in many more ways than men.

But maybe men think differently, so tell me guys, do we need a Men’s Coalition, do you feel discriminated against?

January 25th, 2008

Should royal males still take precedence on inheriting the throne?

It may sound like a sexually transmitted disease, but image image primogeniture is in fact the common law right of the first born son to inherit the entire estate, to the exclusion of younger siblings. Note the word “son” in this sentence, in this enlightened day of sexual equality.

So why in the 21st century do males still take precedence over females when succeeding the throne? Why are females ranked lower than males in their royal household? And isn’t it a seriously worrying thought that Princess Beatrice should rank 5th in line to the throne while our hard working Princess Anne limps behind at 10th? Who would you have more confidence in as your monarch if we ever reached such extreme measures?

I was heartened to learn from the erudite Graham Dines, a top ranking political editor with the East Anglian Daily Times, that this dated legislation is unlikely to have a leg to stand on in the European courts, should any female royals chose to challenge it.

In his blog, he states:

“It’s time to do away with the Act of Succession, which wouldn’t stand up to the scrutiny of the European Court because of its discrimination against Catholics and women.”

I didn’t realise that a cross-party group of MPs, including Colchester’s Bob Russell, wants an end to primogeniture. I have no idea how much support it has, but what about you think, do you feel our female royals are unfairly discriminated against today?