Ellee Seymour

MCIPR, PRESS CONSULTANT, JOURNALIST, POLITICAL AND PR BLOGGER.

Boris 1boris 17boris 16boris 12boris 13boris 15boris4boris2boris 6boris 7boris 9boris 11boris 3
February 8th, 2008

Prostitution and the World Cup

South African MP George Lekgetho has called for prostitution to Carol Freeman be legalised during the football World Cup to be held there in 2010. He believes it would help cut incidences of rape and would bring in taxes to fight poverty.

But my CHASTE colleague Carol Freeman suggests a different perspective and argues why this is not the answer:

Last week, George Lekgetho, when arguing for the legalisation of prostitution for the 2010 World Cup, said: “It is one of the things that would make it [the tournament] a success because we hear of many rapes, because people don’t have access to them [women].” Statements like this one confirm all my worst fears about the position of women abuse and myths about rape in South Africa.

The premises here are firstly that men are incapable of controlling their sexual urges; secondly, that if such urges go unsatisfied, men will resort to rape; and thirdly, that it is up to the government to provide enabling legislation for these uncontrollable sexual desires — all are deeply disturbing!

Many men throughout the world experience extended periods of celibacy without using prostitutes, or indeed resorting to rape. The commonly perpetuated myth that a man’s sexuality is somehow more urgent and savage than a woman’s should be deeply offensive to men. Many men and women throughout all ethnic groups and cultures choose to exercise their sexuality only in committed, loving relationships; or, at the very least, with another consenting adult. There should be no place for this myth to continue in a society which strives to promote the value of equality.

Men rape for many reasons, including a desire to exert power in response to a feeling of entitlement, or perhaps to fulfil a need to humiliate and oppress their victims to compensate for their own perceived inadequacy. These men are rapists, and as diverse and as complex as the reasons for their behaviour may be, it is by no means excusable and should never be tolerated. The idea that men in general are capable of rape if their carnal desires cannot be satisfied elsewhere is preposterous, and profoundly insulting.

It is dangerous to perpetuate the myth that all men will forcefully and violently take from a woman “sexual gratification” when they can find no one to give it willingly, as this implies that any man would be willing to rape — this simply is not true. Most men have a profound respect for women, and would never assault anyone in this most violent and intrusive way. Men who rape do not do it for sexual gratification, and they should be removed from society.

Finally, even if George Lekgetho’s thoroughly misguided belief were true, when did it become the government’s responsibility to legislate in order to accommodate this most anti-social behaviour? Women who work in the sex industry already suffer a higher number of assaults and rapes than any other group. With the exception of relatively few “high class” call girls and massage-parlour sex workers, women in this industry tend to be desperate and thoroughly exploited. Their situation may be such that they have no choice but to sell their bodies in order to feed their families. Such women are vulnerable enough without sending men to them who now believe that they have a government-endorsed right to sex. Regulation would not protect these women, as they are exactly the kind of people sought by such predators.

It is to South Africa’s credit that it has been chosen to host this most prestigious tournament. This does mean, however, that the eyes of the world will be scrutinising our young democracy. When comments like these are reported internationally they paint a bleak picture of men, women and sexuality in the South African context. With rape and violence against women at catastrophic levels, ideologies like Mr Lekgetho’s cannot go unquestioned. I sincerely hope that the 2010 World Cup does not focus on providing sexual experiences for men at the expense of being a successful sporting tournament, one of which all South Africans can be proud.

*During the last World Cup in Germany in 2006, experience shows that trafficking increased because at every big sporting event where a large number of men gather, there is a spectacular rise in the demand for sexual services.

Women’s organisations feared that many innocent women may have been tricked into arriving in Germany with deceptive job offers and then found themselves defenceless and vulnerable in a country they did not know. This is Anna’s story, a 20-year-old Bulgarian, forced into sex slavery, which was highlighted during the World Cup in Germany.

I would like to see South African MPs show more commitment to fighting AIDs and corruption instead, and protect women from being placed at potential risk.

February 8th, 2008

Can Labour run an effective social media campaign?

imageI recently contributed an article on political blogging to Richard Bailey for the next publication of Behind the Spin. I naturally mentioned how Labour lagged behind Conservative bloggers, who have fire in their bellies and have dominated the political blogging scene, as any opposition party hungry for success would.

Since then, I have been informed of LabourHome’s intention to use its blog to launch its own candidate to oppose the re-election of Jack Dromey as treasurer of the Labour Party, but too late for inclusion with my story.

It is promoting Mark McDonald, a human rights barrister and associate editor of LabourHome, as its preferred choice, who is hoping to "reconnect the party to grassroots via the internet".

Mark says:

This is a campaign begun from the grass roots. It is probably the first major campaign in the UK run using the new media of blogging and the internet. It is my object to harness all that this new media technology enabling me not just to talk to members but also to set up forums so they can talk to me. I intend to talk to as members as I can, to visit CLP’s, (constituency Labour Parties) particularly outside London and importantly when it comes to this election the unions.”

I seem to remember five of the six Labour Party deputy leadership candidates using blogs for their campaign, and the one I judged to be best became the winner.

It’s obvious that the social media is going to be an active campaigning tool during any elections. However, Labour contestants in the deputy leadership battle failed to keep their blogs running afterwards. Why did the conversation suddenly stop? They are still elected politicians serving constituents, as well as the nation.

What will be different this time? Can Labour really run an effective grassroots social media campaign? I wish it every success because Labour needs to develop this technique, only time will tell if it will become a role model for best practice.

Update: I have just read the front page splash about this in today’s PR Week which states "Labour plotters to ape Clinton comms tactics". Then it occurred to me, where is Mark McDonald’s personal and dedicated campaign blog? So I typed his name in Google with the word "blog" added and came up with two totally different people ranked at the very top, one who describes himself as "a musician and a laugh", while the second Mark is pictured swigging beer from a bottle.

Why does LabourHome’s own Mark McDonald not have his own blog? If I have missed it, please let me know. As it stands, he is hiding his real identity behind an already established site written by other bloggers. Let’s see the real Mark McDonald show his true face on his own site.